Commit graph

4 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Henrik Lissner
ad6a3d0f33
refactor: deprecate featurep! for modulep!
featurep! will be renamed modulep! in the future, so it's been
deprecated. They have identical interfaces, and can be replaced without
issue.

featurep! was never quite the right name for this macro. It implied that
it had some connection to featurep, which it doesn't (only that it was
similar in purpose; still, Doom modules are not features). To undo such
implications and be consistent with its namespace (and since we're
heading into a storm of breaking changes with the v3 release anyway),
now was the best opportunity to begin the transition.
2022-08-14 20:43:35 +02:00
Henrik Lissner
c06040338a
fix(lsp,tree-sitter): void-function lsp!/tree-sitter! errors
These are autodefs, meaning they should be defined whether or not the
containing module is enabled, but they should no-op when it's disabled,
by defining a no-op macro with the same name. However, lsp! and
tree-sitter! are meant to be used as hooks, and you can't use macros as
hooks, so you get void-function errors when they are used as such.

This ensures they are properly defined as no-op functions in those
cases. I.e.

  ;;;###autodef FORM

FORM is used instead of a no-op macro if the parent module is disabled.
2022-06-22 20:35:52 +02:00
Henrik Lissner
7784c0b6e9
No-op (lsp) if already enabled #3390
`lsp-deferred` calls `lsp` and `lsp` seems to do something expensive
whether or not lsp-mode is already active. Over TRAMP, this is much too
expensive, so we no-op lsp-deferred if lsp-mode is already active.
2020-08-02 16:27:09 -04:00
Gerry Agbobada
3e5b7cce3f
[eglot] Add support for eglot lsp client in emacs
- Update README
- Add eglot-specifics to cc, rs, py, hs
  removing unused lsp-mode packages when eglot is active
- Add eglot-specific bindings
- Add doctor warnings for debugger +lsp and +peek
- Add eglot-backed lookup-handlers
- Add flycheck checker using eglot for :checkers
  syntax users (using flycheck/flycheck#1676 and
  flycheck/flycheck#1592 discussion).
  This implementation is based on @marsam code, and uses recent
  Flycheck development in order to make the code smaller and
  easier to maintain.
2020-05-28 09:34:10 +02:00