Refactor out map.el usage
After some profiling, it turns out map-put and map-delete are 5-7x slower (more on Emacs 25) than delq, setf/alist-get and add-to-list for small lists (under 250 items), which is exactly how I've been using them. The only caveat is alist-get's signature is different on Emacs 25, thus a polyfill is necessary in core-lib.
This commit is contained in:
parent
f602a1f607
commit
f6dc6ac74e
29 changed files with 177 additions and 146 deletions
|
@ -2,7 +2,9 @@
|
|||
|
||||
(defun +file-templates--set (pred plist)
|
||||
(if (null (car-safe plist))
|
||||
(setq +file-templates-alist (map-delete +file-templates-alist pred))
|
||||
(setq +file-templates-alist
|
||||
(delq (assoc pred +file-templates-alist)
|
||||
+file-templates-alist))
|
||||
(push `(,pred ,@plist) +file-templates-alist)))
|
||||
|
||||
;;;###autodef
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue