emenel/doomemacs
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

Revise comments

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Henrik Lissner 2021-04-25 18:35:49 -04:00
parent c9b41205b2
commit 9d643b14ed
3 changed files with 19 additions and 20 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

6
modules/lang/scheme/autoload.el
View file

@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
;;; lang/scheme/autoload.el -*- lexical-binding: t; -*-
;; HACK `geiser' has poor autoload ettiquette. It calls
;; HACK `geiser' has poor autoload etiquette. It calls
;; `geiser-activate-implementation' and `geiser-implementation-extension'
;; in their autoloads files. Sure, these functions are autoloaded, but this
;; needlessly (and unavoidably) pulls in the `geiser-impl' package (et co)
@ -9,8 +9,8 @@
;; I rectify this by inlining calls to these two functions (and the
;; `geiser-impl--add-to-alist' sub-call in
;; `geiser-implementation-extension'), and autoloading the two variables
;; they operate on. I do this from our autoloads file (which is read right
;; before package autoloads are).
;; they operate on. I do this from our autoloads file (which is
;; byte-compiled and read at startup before package autoloads).
;; TODO At some point, PR this behavior upstream (but not verbatim!)
;;;###autoload (defvar geiser-active-implementations ())
;;;###autoload (defvar geiser-implementations-alist ())